Friday, November 18, 2011


Now something else (new). For the first time I tried MFSK16 with MMVARI beta ver 0.45 I never did MFSK16 before. With JT65 the band is very crowded, more and more hams discover JT65A. So the 2 KHz bandwidth is becoming too small for so many people. That's why I moved to the noiseless MFSK16 frequencies. I called on 10 meter (28.080 MHz) and after a few CQ calls, UA4FPW/QRP came back for me. We had a nice qso. On 20 meter I worked OK2TB with MFSK16.


  1. Good morning Paul, my Signalink came in today and I will attempt to join the JT-65 gang this weekend...see how the setup goes. Hope your wife is feeling better and it was nice to hear the recent news from the medical results.

  2. Hallo Paul, Ik heb nog nooit MFSK16 gebruikt, maar het schijnt beter te zijn dan PSK in verbindingen over lange afstand over de pool. Ik ben benieuwd naar je bevindingen. 73, Bert

  3. Hi Mike, I am curious how your JT65 experience will be. Good luck, 73 Paul

  4. Hallo Bert, PSK heeft geen error correction. Dat heeft MFSK wel, dus wat dat betreft stabieler. Raar dat het toch weinig gebruikt wordt. 73 Paul


Thank you for dropping by and leaving a comment. 73 Paul

Popular Posts